World Without Colour free essay sample

No doubt, a World without Colour will be extremely boring. But, one many of us will gasp in disbelief when we understand that various colors seen in this world of objects are actually non-existent. Every object is basically colorless but when it is exposed to solar rays these objects absorb certain colors from the rays and reject others. It is only on this basis that we see ‘colored’ objects. That color not absorbed by an object is sent back i. e. reflected. This reflected light enters our eye and thus we think that object to be of the reflected solar ray’s color. Plants in reality are not green in color since basically they are colorless. But they appear as green because plants cannot absorb the ‘green’ color of solar rays falling on them. Since this green color gets reflected it enters our eye which assumes that the plant is green in color. We will write a custom essay sample on World Without Colour or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When the green unabsorbed color gets reflected it enters our eyes and thus the latter out of delusion says ‘the plant is green in color’. Yet, a monochrome World be much similar to watching a black and white television. There would be not much variation and everything would be of the same shades, black and white, would be so gray, sad and gloomy.. Colours make nature, fashion, flags and the various races much more interesting and diverse. Without colours, nature would not be appreciated as much as it is coloured. A peach and an apple would look almost identical. There would be no distinct features. There would be no longer a wider range of choices when shopping. Accessories like earrings and necklaces would no longer stand out unless they were really one of kind. Therefore, I strongly agree that without colour, the world would indeed be a boring place to exist.

Obeying the law essays

Obeying the law essays Obeying the law is a general moral obligation. Usually, laws are written from societal ethical codes; therefore the law can embody morality. Obeying the law usually implies the greatest good for the greatest number of people and therefore complies with Mill's utilitarianism. Especially if the law reflects general morality or protects people from pain, such as the admonition against murder, utilitarian theorists would argue that obeying the law is a general moral obligation. However, there are certain situations in which morality transcends the law. Utilitarian philosophy, such as that of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, can be applied to situations in which disobeying the law can be actually considered morally acceptable if the consequence is pleasure for a great number of people. Obeying the law is a general moral obligation that should reflect the greatest good for the greatest number; the law can be broken if it results in pleasure or benefit for a large number of people. However, the law usually reflects the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Laws against killing, stealing, or driving drunk should be dutifully obeyed, according to both teleological and deontological theories. Obeying the law is an inherently moral act, according to deontologists like Kant. There is a categorical imperative to obey the law no matter what the consequences are. Cheating on taxes might enable a family to enjoy a few hundred more dollars that presumably the US government would not miss, but cheating on taxes is immoral because it is illegal. Even utilitarian theorists like John Stuart Mill would argue that cheating on taxes is immoral regardless of the short-term gains. Cheating on taxes could ultimately lead to prosecution, which would be a painful situation. Moreover, taxes are ideally applied to beneficial human services and cheating on taxes therefore steals money from...